Initial commit: opencode config with 32 skills, 3 agents, 11 MCPs

- Cross-platform install scripts (Windows PowerShell + Unix bash)
- Template-based config generation with env var support
- Skills: coding-standards, frontend-patterns, backend-patterns,
  security-review, tdd-workflow, e2e-testing, deep-research,
  exa-search, content-engine, crosspost, x-api, and 20 more
- Agents: explorer, reviewer, docs-researcher
- MCPs: codegraph, brave-search, playwright, github, context7,
  exa, memory, sequential-thinking, git, filesystem

skills/investor-outreach/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+---
+name: investor-outreach
+description: Draft cold emails, warm intro blurbs, follow-ups, update emails, and investor communications for fundraising. Use when the user wants outreach to angels, VCs, strategic investors, or accelerators and needs concise, personalized, investor-facing messaging.
+---
+
+# Investor Outreach
+
+Write investor communication that is short, concrete, and easy to act on.
+
+## When to Activate
+
+- writing a cold email to an investor
+- drafting a warm intro request
+- sending follow-ups after a meeting or no response
+- writing investor updates during a process
+- tailoring outreach based on fund thesis or partner fit
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. Personalize every outbound message.
+2. Keep the ask low-friction.
+3. Use proof instead of adjectives.
+4. Stay concise.
+5. Never send copy that could go to any investor.
+
+## Voice Handling
+
+If the user's voice matters, run `brand-voice` first and reuse its `VOICE PROFILE`.
+This skill should keep the investor-specific structure and ask discipline, not recreate its own parallel voice system.
+
+## Hard Bans
+
+Delete and rewrite any of these:
+- "I'd love to connect"
+- "excited to share"
+- generic thesis praise without a real tie-in
+- vague founder adjectives
+- begging language
+- soft closing questions when a direct ask is clearer
+
+## Cold Email Structure
+
+1. subject line: short and specific
+2. opener: why this investor specifically
+3. pitch: what the company does, why now, and what proof matters
+4. ask: one concrete next step
+5. sign-off: name, role, and one credibility anchor if needed
+
+## Personalization Sources
+
+Reference one or more of:
+- relevant portfolio companies
+- a public thesis, talk, post, or article
+- a mutual connection
+- a clear market or product fit with the investor's focus
+
+If that context is missing, state that the draft still needs personalization instead of pretending it is finished.
+
+## Follow-Up Cadence
+
+Default:
+- day 0: initial outbound
+- day 4 or 5: short follow-up with one new data point
+- day 10 to 12: final follow-up with a clean close
+
+Do not keep nudging after that unless the user wants a longer sequence.
+
+## Warm Intro Requests
+
+Make life easy for the connector:
+- explain why the intro is a fit
+- include a forwardable blurb
+- keep the forwardable blurb under 100 words
+
+## Post-Meeting Updates
+
+Include:
+- the specific thing discussed
+- the answer or update promised
+- one new proof point if available
+- the next step
+
+## Quality Gate
+
+Before delivering:
+- the message is genuinely personalized
+- the ask is explicit
+- the proof point is concrete
+- filler praise and softener language are gone
+- word count stays tight